kynetradb
One Rust binary: BM25 search + vector + KV + document + auth + files + realtime + agentic admin.
vs
Pinecone
Managed serverless vector database built for ML teams — insert, query, filter at any scale.
Feature comparison
| Dimension | kynetradb | Pinecone |
|---|---|---|
| Full-text search | BM25 — reference catalogue | None |
| Vector search | Brute-force cosine evaluationPinecone uses HNSW which scales better past ~100k vectors | HNSW |
| Auth | Preview scope | None |
| Row-Level Security | Preview scope | No |
| File storage | Preview scope | None |
| Realtime | Preview scope | None |
| Edge Functions | Preview scope | No |
| TypeScript SDK | Preview scope | No official client SDK |
| KV lookups | Preview scope | No |
| Document filter | Preview scope | Yes |
| LLM runtime | Preview scope | No |
| Outbound DB sync | Preview scope | No |
| Self-host | Preview scope | No (managed only) |
| Single binary | Preview scope | No |
| License | Preview terms — request a scoped evaluation | SaaS-only |
| Deploy targets | 19 target profiles | 0 listed target profiles |
| Free tier | Preview access by request | yes — 1 index, 100k vectors |
When to pick Pinecone
Managed serverless vector with zero infra, massive scale, and the deepest LangChain/LlamaIndex ecosystem integrations. No self-host option.
- You need HNSW at scale past ~100k vectors — kynetradb uses brute-force today.
- Your team is already invested in Pinecone's SDK and ecosystem.
When to pick kynetradb
- You want a comparison-led conversation about BM25 full-text, vector evaluation, and data-plane trade-offs.
- You need a product-specific implementation scope rather than a generic migration claim.
- You want to assess 19 hosting target profiles, including 5 Indian providers.
- You want a scoped preview conversation about the data, deployment, and operating boundary.
- You need to run on your own infra — Pinecone is managed-only.
- You want a single binary with no runtime dependencies — no container fleet to operate.
Vector upsert + query — both APIs side by side
Upsert an embedding and query nearest neighbours. These are documentation-accurate shapes, not runnable end-to-end examples.
kynetradb
# kynetradb — upsert entity with embedding
curl -X POST https://your.host/v1/entities \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"kind": "product",
"attrs": { "title": "Aurora Espresso" },
"embedding": [0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4]
}'
# kynetradb — vector similarity query
curl -X POST https://your.host/v1/vector \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"vector": [0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4],
"top_k": 10
}'Pinecone
# Pinecone — REST API
# Upsert
curl -X POST https://INDEX_NAME.svc.ENV.pinecone.io/vectors/upsert \
-H "Api-Key: $PINECONE_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"vectors": [{"id": "aurora-espresso", "values": [0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4]}]
}'
# Query
curl -X POST https://INDEX_NAME.svc.ENV.pinecone.io/query \
-H "Api-Key: $PINECONE_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"vector": [0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4], "topK": 10}'